Python PyCryptodome Insufficient DSA Key Size Vulnerability

Medium Risk Cryptographic Weakness
PythonPyCryptodomeDSADigital SignaturesKey SizeCryptography

What it is

Application uses DSA (Digital Signature Algorithm) with insufficient key sizes that are vulnerable to cryptographic attacks and do not meet current security standards.

from Crypto.PublicKey import DSA from Crypto.Signature import DSS from Crypto.Hash import SHA256 from flask import Flask, request @app.route('/generate_key') def generate_key(): # Vulnerable: Insufficient DSA key size key = DSA.generate(1024) # Too small, vulnerable private_key = key.export_key() public_key = key.publickey().export_key() return { 'private_key': private_key.decode(), 'public_key': public_key.decode() } @app.route('/sign_data', methods=['POST']) def sign_data(): # Vulnerable: Using weak DSA key private_key_pem = request.form.get('private_key') data = request.form.get('data').encode() key = DSA.import_key(private_key_pem) hash_obj = SHA256.new(data) signer = DSS.new(key, 'fips-186-3') signature = signer.sign(hash_obj) return signature.hex()
from Crypto.PublicKey import DSA, ECC from Crypto.Signature import DSS, eddsa from Crypto.Hash import SHA256 from flask import Flask, request import base64 def validate_dsa_key_size(key): """Validate DSA key meets minimum security requirements.""" if key.key_size < 2048: raise ValueError(f'DSA key size {key.key_size} is insufficient. Minimum 2048 bits required.') return True @app.route('/generate_key') def generate_key(): """Generate secure DSA key with sufficient size.""" try: # Secure: Use 3072-bit DSA key key = DSA.generate(3072) # Validate key size validate_dsa_key_size(key) private_key = key.export_key() public_key = key.publickey().export_key() return { 'private_key': base64.b64encode(private_key).decode(), 'public_key': base64.b64encode(public_key).decode(), 'key_size': key.key_size, 'algorithm': 'DSA-3072' } except Exception as e: return {'error': 'Key generation failed'}, 500 @app.route('/generate_ecdsa_key') def generate_ecdsa_key(): """Generate ECDSA key as secure alternative.""" try: # Secure: Use ECDSA P-256 curve key = ECC.generate(curve='P-256') private_key = key.export_key(format='PEM') public_key = key.public_key().export_key(format='PEM') return { 'private_key': base64.b64encode(private_key.encode()).decode(), 'public_key': base64.b64encode(public_key.encode()).decode(), 'curve': 'P-256', 'algorithm': 'ECDSA' } except Exception as e: return {'error': 'ECDSA key generation failed'}, 500 @app.route('/sign_data', methods=['POST']) def sign_data(): """Secure data signing with key validation.""" try: private_key_b64 = request.form.get('private_key', '') data = request.form.get('data', '').encode('utf-8') if not private_key_b64 or not data: return {'error': 'Private key and data required'}, 400 # Decode private key private_key_pem = base64.b64decode(private_key_b64) key = DSA.import_key(private_key_pem) # Validate key size validate_dsa_key_size(key) # Create hash and sign hash_obj = SHA256.new(data) signer = DSS.new(key, 'fips-186-3') signature = signer.sign(hash_obj) return { 'signature': base64.b64encode(signature).decode(), 'algorithm': f'DSA-{key.key_size}', 'hash': 'SHA-256' } except ValueError as e: return {'error': str(e)}, 400 except Exception as e: return {'error': 'Signing failed'}, 500

💡 Why This Fix Works

See fix suggestions for detailed explanation.

Why it happens

Code generates weak DSA keys: from Crypto.PublicKey import DSA; key = DSA.generate(1024). 1024-bit DSA keys no longer secure. NIST deprecated 1024-bit in 2013. Computational advances enable factorization. Minimum 2048-bit required. 3072-bit recommended for long-term security.

Root causes

Generating DSA Keys with Less Than 2048 Bits

Code generates weak DSA keys: from Crypto.PublicKey import DSA; key = DSA.generate(1024). 1024-bit DSA keys no longer secure. NIST deprecated 1024-bit in 2013. Computational advances enable factorization. Minimum 2048-bit required. 3072-bit recommended for long-term security.

Legacy Systems with 1024-bit DSA Keys

Old SSH servers using 1024-bit DSA. Legacy SSL/TLS certificates. Historical key generation before 2010. Inherited infrastructure with weak keys. Migration difficulty with deployed keys. Backward compatibility requirements. Legacy keys remain in production despite weaknesses.

Using DSA Instead of Modern Signature Algorithms

Choosing DSA over better alternatives. EdDSA (Ed25519) provides better security and performance. ECDSA with P-256 or P-384. RSA-PSS for RSA systems. DSA legacy algorithm. Modern applications should prefer elliptic curve signatures.

Not Understanding DSA Key Size Security Requirements

Developers unaware of key size importance. Believing any DSA key sufficient. Not understanding computational advances affecting security. Missing NIST guidelines knowledge. Historical 1024-bit keys seemed strong. Insufficient security awareness about modern key size requirements.

Compliance Requirements Accepting Weak DSA Keys

Outdated compliance standards allowing 1024-bit. PCI DSS older versions. Legacy regulatory requirements. Industry standards not updated. Compliance checkbox mentality. Following letter of old standards instead of security best practices.

Fixes

1

Generate DSA Keys with Minimum 2048 Bits

Use adequate key size: from Crypto.PublicKey import DSA; key = DSA.generate(2048). Minimum 2048 bits per NIST SP 800-57. 3072 bits for long-term security (>2030). Larger keys slower but necessary. Follow NIST recommendations for key sizes.

2

Migrate to Ed25519 for Better Security and Performance

Use modern EdDSA: from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric import ed25519; private_key = ed25519.Ed25519PrivateKey.generate(). 128-bit security with 256-bit keys. Faster than DSA. Simpler implementation. No random number per signature. Modern SSH and TLS use Ed25519.

3

Use ECDSA with P-256 or P-384 Curves

Elliptic curve alternative: from Crypto.PublicKey import ECC; key = ECC.generate(curve='P-256'). Smaller keys than RSA/DSA with equivalent security. NIST approved curves. P-256 for 128-bit security, P-384 for 192-bit. Modern standard for digital signatures.

4

Implement Automated Key Size Validation

Validate key sizes: if key.size_in_bits() < 2048: raise ValueError('Insufficient key size'). Runtime checks during key generation. Configuration validation. Reject weak keys at application boundary. Audit existing keys for compliance with minimum sizes.

5

Rotate Legacy Keys to Modern Algorithms and Sizes

Key rotation plan: generate new 2048-bit or Ed25519 keys. Gradual migration from 1024-bit DSA. Update SSH authorized_keys. Re-issue certificates. Client update coordination. Complete migration schedule for all legacy keys.

6

Follow Current NIST SP 800-57 Key Management Guidelines

Implement NIST recommendations: 2048-bit minimum through 2030, 3072-bit beyond. Key lifecycle management. Cryptographic period limits. Algorithm transition planning. Regular security reviews. Maintain compliance with current standards, not historical ones.

Detect This Vulnerability in Your Code

Sourcery automatically identifies python pycryptodome insufficient dsa key size vulnerability and many other security issues in your codebase.